1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 143 F.Supp.
  5. 143 F.Supp. 686 (1956)
 

A. B. C. NEEDLECRAFT CO. v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.

143 F.Supp. 686 (1956)

A. B. C. NEEDLECRAFT CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, Inc., and Sigmund Heftman, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 27, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Apfel, New York City, for plaintiff.

White & Case, New York City, for defendants.

REEVES, District Judge.

The defendant, Dun & Bradstreet, Mo., has assigned and vigorously urges many reasons why the verdict in the above cause should be set aside and a new trial granted.

The action is one for libel claimed to have occurred late in the year 1950. A credit report issued by the defendant stated that the plaintiff corporation had been dissolved and its affairs fully liquidated. This was an admitted error, and a few days thereafter the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases