1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 207 Or.
  5. 207 Or. 487 (1956)
 

HOPFER v. STAUDT

207 Or. 487 (1956)

298 P.2d 186

HOPFER v. STAUDT and LOS ANGELES-SEATTLE MOTOR EXPRESS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 31, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Crookham, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer and Charles S. Crookham, all of Portland.

Paul F. Burris, Salem, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. On the brief was Allan G. Carson, of Salem.

John Gordon Gearin, Portland, argued the cause for cross-respondent. With him on the brief were Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf, John Gordon Gearin, Oglesby H. Young, James H. Clarke, all of Portland.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, ROSSMAN, LUSK, BRAND and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

BRAND, J.

The plaintiff Hopfer brought this action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. The defendants were E.T. Staudt and Los Angeles-Seattle Motor Express, Inc., a corporation, hereafter called LASME. There was a verdict for plaintiff and against both defendants, for $20,000, and judgment was entered thereon. Thereafter the defendant E.T. Staudt, acting for himself alone, moved for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases