1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 40 N.J.
  5. 40 N.J. Super. 526 (1956)
 

BARBER v. HOHL

40 N.J. Super. 526 (1956)

123 A.2d 785

THEODORE R. BARBER, ET UX, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HENRY D. HOHL, ET UX, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 27, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Vincent A. Grasso argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Hiering & Grasso, attorneys).

Mr. Julius Robinson argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

We first call attention to the unqualified endorsement of consent at the foot of the judgment under review by counsel for defendants. On its face the consent thereby evidenced would bar the right of appeal. Cf. Lincoln Memorial Park of Millstone v. Lutheran Cemetery, 117 N.J. Eq. 481, 482 (E. & A. 1935). But it is conceded by plaintiffs that the form of endorsement drawn by their counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases