1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 139 F.Supp.
  5. 139 F.Supp. 381 (1956)
 

WEINKLE v. OSTERNECK

Civ. A. No. 12607.

139 F.Supp. 381 (1956)

Jerome WEINKLE and Zena Weinkle v. David OSTERNECK.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 26, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nochem S. Winnet, Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Joseph X. Yaffe, Yaffe & Gould, Philadelphia, Pa., Nathan M. Weiss and Jerome S. Heller, New York City, of counsel, for defendants.

KRAFT, District Judge.

In their initial complaint the plaintiffs, citizens of Florida, sought to recover from the defendant, a Pennsylvania citizen, the balance claimed on a contract for the sale by plaintiffs to defendant of stock of a North Carolina corporation. Defendant's answer to this complaint denied the contract and any payment on account. Plaintiffs then filed an amended complaint of four counts. The first count reiterated the claim on the contract and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases