1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 42 N.J.
  5. 42 N.J. Super. 7 (1956)
 

STATE v. FRANKEL

42 N.J. Super. 7 (1956)

125 A.2d 728

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDMUND FRANKEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 4, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Christian Bollermann argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, Mr. James T. Kirk, Deputy Attorney-General, and Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., Deputy Attorney-General, attorneys).

Mr. Leopold Frankel argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, DAVIDSON and TOMASULO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal from a conviction of the defendant, on trial de novo in the Morris County Court, for violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-88(a) in that, while driving his automobile on a four-lane highway, he failed to stay in the lane nearest the right-hand side of the highway. The evidence sustaining the conviction was given...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases