1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 40 N.J.
  5. 40 N.J. Super. 439 (1956)
 

CARTERET v. DIV., ETC., DEPT., TAXATION AND FIN.

40 N.J. Super. 439 (1956)

123 A.2d 559

BOROUGH OF CARTERET, APPELLANT, v. DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE, APPELLANT, v. DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, ETC., RESPONDENT. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, APPELLANT, v. DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, ETC., RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 22, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer W. Jaffe argued the cause for the appellant Borough of Carteret (Mr. Nathaniel A. Jacoby, attorney; Mr. Emil E. Stremlau, of counsel).

Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for the appellant Borough of Sayreville (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys; Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief).

Mr. Isadore Rosenblum argued the cause for the appellant Township of Woodbridge.

Mr. John F. Crane, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for respondent Division of Tax Appeals, etc. (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Harold Kolovsky, Assistant Attorney-General, of counsel; Mr. Thomas P. Nolan, Deputy Attorney-General, on the brief).

Mr. Frederick F. Richardson, special counsel for respondent City of New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

The Boroughs of Carteret and Sayreville and the Township of Woodbridge appeal from the August 30, 1955 judgment of the Division of Tax Appeals entered following its hearing for the purpose of revising and correcting the equalization table adopted by the Middlesex County Tax Board for the year 1955.

The assessors of the various municipalities of Middlesex County completed the assessments of the local...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases