1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 24 Misc.2d
  5. 24 Misc.2d 434 (1956)
 

CENT. HUD. GAS CORP. v. HATZEL & BEUHLER

24 Misc.2d 434 (1956)

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Hatzel and Beuhler, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Dutchess County.

December 15, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watts, Oakes & Vander Voort (Frank Cline of counsel), for defendant. Garvey & Conway (Thomas Rattigan of counsel), for plaintiff.

SAMUEL W. EAGER, J.

This motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice attacks the sufficiency of each of the two causes of action in the complaint herein. It appears from the pleadings that one Sorenson was caused to fall, on collapsing of a ladder on which Corporation (herein referred to as Central Hudson) and its employee Lowe to recover for personal injuries sustained when

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases