1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 207 Or.
  5. 207 Or. 222 (1956)
 

SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. BROWN

207 Or. 222 (1956)

295 P.2d 861

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. BROWN ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 11, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy C. Atchison, Assistant Attorney General, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem; Kenneth E. Brown, District Attorney, Salem; and Gerald C. Knapp, Assistant Attorney General, Portland.

Oglesby H. Young, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Koerner, Young, McColloch & Dezendorf and Joseph Larkin, Portland.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, ROSSMAN, LUSK, BRAND and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment to determine the meaning of § 113-613, OCLA (ORS 764.150), brought by Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against Kenneth E. Brown, district attorney for Marion county, Oregon, successor in interest to Edward W. Stadter, Jr., and Norman O. Nilsen, labor commissioner of the state of Oregon, successor in interest to William E. Kimsey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases