1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 22 N.J.
  5. 22 N.J. 389 (1956)
 

JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, ETC., LOCAL 687 v. POLLINO

22 N.J. 389 (1956)

126 A.2d 194

THE JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS AND COSMETOLOGISTS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 687, NOW KNOWN AS JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS, COSMETOLOGISTS AND PROPRIETORS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION 687, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROY POLLINO, VINCENT CANNAMELA, CHARLES GUARINO AND JOHN TOTH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 24, 1956.

Decided October 29, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Samuel V. Convery, attorney; Mr. John J. Clancy, of counsel; Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief).

Mr. Abraham L. Friedman argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Rothbard, Harris & Oxfeld, attorneys; Mr. Samuel L. Rothbard, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Middlesex County District Court rejected the plaintiff union's claim in replevin for the return of its union shop cards possessed by the defendants who operate barbershops in Perth Amboy; the Appellate Division in an opinion reported at 39 N.J.Super. 250 (App. Div. 1956) reversed the district court with direction that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases