1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Minn.
  4. 248 Minn.
  5. 248 Minn. 162 (1956)
 

HOEHN v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.

Nos. 36,914, 36,915, 36,916.

248 Minn. 162 (1956)

79 N.W. (2d) 19

HENRY HOEHN v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY. DAYTON'S BLUFF SHEET METAL WORKS AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 26, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.E. Cummins, Linus J. Hammond, and Cummins, Cummins, Hammond & Ames, for appellant.

Doherty, Rumble & Butler, R.J. Leonard, and Eugene M. Warlich, for respondent Ellerbe & Company.

Meagher, Geer, Markham & Anderson, O.C. Adamson II, and David W. Nord, for respondent Curtis 1000, Inc.

Gordon Mangan, Bundlie, Kelley & Maun, and O.C. Adamson II, for respondent Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal Works.

Lipschultz, Altman & Geraghty, for respondent Henry Hoehn.

KNUTSON, JUSTICE.

Originally this action was commenced against Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, a corporation; Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal Works; Curtis 1000, Inc., a corporation; and Ellerbe & Company, Inc., a corporation, to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when a row of 15 steel lockers, bolted together and installed in a new building constructed by Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, fell on him while he was engaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases