1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 207 Or.
  5. 207 Or. 175 (1956)
 

CLAYTON v. ALUMA-LOCK CORP.

207 Or. 175 (1956)

294 P.2d 333

294 P.2d 1117

CLAYTON v. ALUMA-LOCK CORP.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 1, 1956.

Objection to cost bill allowed March 21, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis F. Yunker, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Yunker, Fewless & Hannam, Portland.

Norman N. Griffith and William L. Josslin, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before TOOZE, Acting Chief Justice, and LUSK, BRAND and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This was an action to recover damages for breach of warranty. The defendant corporation, which is in the roofing business, installed a new roof on plaintiff's

[207 Or. 176]
residence. Before doing the work the defendant represented in writing to the plaintiff: "We will stand behind this roof for leaking, rusting or deterioration for the life of your home." Plaintiff alleged in her complaint that the roof leaked...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases