1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 22 N.J.
  5. 22 N.J. 326 (1956)
 

FIFTH ST. PIER CORP. v. CITY OF HOBOKEN

22 N.J. 326 (1956)

126 A.2d 6

FIFTH STREET PIER CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND AS RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND AS PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 22, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Raymond J. Lamb argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).

Mr. David D. Furman, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the respondent Division of Tax Appeals, Department of the Treasury (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Herbert H. Fine argued the cause for the respondent City of Hoboken.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This appeal stems from 26 judgments entered by the Division of Tax Appeals. They concern assessments levied on property of the Fifth Street Pier Corporation (hereinafter termed plaintiff) during the years 1948-1953, inclusive, by the defendant City of Hoboken. Judicial consideration has been given by the Superior Court, Appellate Division, R.R. 4:88-8, which affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases