1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 120 A.2d
  5. 120 A.2d 213 (1956)
 

KURT SCHOEN DANCE STUDIO v. P & H CONTRACTORS

No. 1732.

120 A.2d 213 (1956)

KURT SCHOEN DANCE STUDIO, Inc., a corporation, Appellant, v. P & H CONTRACTORS, Inc., a corporation, trading as District Maintenance Company, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided February 10, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph V. Gartlan, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Leonard S. Melrod, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Harvey A. Jacobs, Washington, D. C., with whom Charles Jay Pilzer and Bernard T. Levin, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Kurt Schoen Dance Studio, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered against it in a suit for janitorial services. The defense was that the money was owing by a man named Alexander who operated the dance studio under a franchise agreement which made him solely responsible for debts incurred by the studio.

There was evidence, verbal and documentary, establishing that the order for the work was placed in the name of Kurt Schoen Dance Studio,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases