1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 209 Md.
  5. 209 Md. 1 (1956)
 

RINAUDO v. BLOOM

[No. 42, October Term, 1955.]

209 Md. 1 (1956)

120 A.2d 184

RINAUDO ET UX. v. BLOOM ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 2, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry M. Decker, Jr., and John L. Sanford, Jr., with whom was Daniel T. Prettyman on the brief, for appellants.

Thomas F. Johnson, with whom were Bernard B. Feikin and Justinus Gould on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.

BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $25,000 and costs rendered in the Circuit Court for Worcester County in favor of Arthur Bloom and his wife Julia May Bloom, appellees, and against Frank J. Rinaudo and his wife Lillian C. Rinaudo, appellants. The suit was brought, following the exercise by the appellees of a right to cancel a contract for the sale of a motor court or "motel", to recover "all deposit monies" alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases