1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 131 F.Supp.
  5. 131 F.Supp. 599 (1955)
 

FLAKICE CORPORATION v. LIQUID FREEZE CORPORATION

No. 31060.

131 F.Supp. 599 (1955)

FLAKICE CORPORATION, a corporation, and York Corporation, a corporation, Plaintiffs, v. LIQUID FREEZE CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

May 19, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Naylor & Lassagne, Jas. M. Naylor, San Francisco, Cal., Daniel L. Morris, Harold L. Stults, Curtis, Morris & Safford, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Richard W. Seed, Seattle, Wash., Tinning & Delap, Richmond, Cal., Mellin, Hanscom & Hursh, Oscar A. Mellin, Leroy Hanscom, Jack E. Hursh, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

EDWARD P. MURPHY, District Judge.

I have heretofore decided the issues raised by the complaint and answer but at that time postponed consideration of the counterclaim pending further argument.

My prior opinion, D.C., 130 F.Supp. 471, disposed of the questions of validity and infringement of certain of the claims of the Short patent (No. 2,310,468, dated February 9, 1943) and certain of the claims of the Raver patent (No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases