1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. T.C.
  4. 23 T.C.
  5. 23 T.C. 672 (1955)
 

KALECH v. COMMISSIONER

Docket Nos. 42376, 42377.

23 T.C. 672 (1955)

PHIL KALECH, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. PHIL KALECH AND ZIPPORAH KALECH, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

United States Tax Court.

Filed January 20, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo J. Schwartz, Esq., for the petitioners.

Thomas C. Cravens, Jr., Esq., for the respondent.

These consolidated proceedings involve the following income tax deficiencies determined against Phil Kalech (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) for the year 1947, and against him and his wife, Zipporah Kalech, for the year 1948:

Docket No.                                             Year     Amount

42376 ----------------------------------------------   1947   $41,784.78
42377 ----------------------------------------------   1948...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases