1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 133 F.Supp.
  5. 133 F.Supp. 531 (1955)
 

TRANSMIRRA PRODUCTS CORP. v. FOURCO GLASS CO.

133 F.Supp. 531 (1955)

TRANSMIRRA PRODUCTS CORP. and Robert Aronstein, Plaintiffs, v. FOURCO GLASS CO., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

August 5, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aronstein & Aronstein, of New York City, for plaintiffs, Robert Aronstein, William B. Aronstein, New York City, of counsel.

Robert E. Burns, of New York City, for defendant, Edward S. Irons, of Washington, D. C., of counsel.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion under Rule 12(b) (3), 28 U.S.C., to dismiss the action because of improper venue. The action is one for patent infringement.

The venue for patent infringement actions is specified in § 1400(b) of Tit. 28 U.S.C. as follows:

"Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases