1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 128 F.Supp.
  5. 128 F.Supp. 449 (1955)
 

RYCHLIK v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN

Civ. 6494.

128 F.Supp. 449 (1955)

N. P. RYCHLIK, individually and on behalf of and as representative of other employees of the Pennsylvania Railroad, Plaintiffs, v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, an unincorporated association, Intervening Defendant, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Defendant.

United States District Court, W. D. New York.

Motion to Reconsider Denied March 29, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meyer Fix, Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

Harold J. Tillou, Buffalo, N. Y., for intervening defendant, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.

Adams, Smith, Brown & Starrett, Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant, Pennsylvania R. Co.

KNIGHT, Chief Judge.

The above entitled matter comes before this Court on an order to show cause obtained by the plaintiff why an order should not be made restraining and granting certain injunctive relief against the defendants, Hartman, Sites, and Gaily, individually and as members of and representatives of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (hereinafter called "BRT") and the Pennsylvania Railroad (hereinafter called "Penn"). By consent of the parties, the BRT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases