R. & S. CO. v. BOARD.

No. 34163.

163 Ohio St. 363 (1955)

THE ROLLMAN & SONS CO., APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF HAMILTON COUNTY, APPELLEE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 25, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles S. Dargusch, Sr., and Mr. David C. Stradley, for appellant.

Mr. C. Watson Hover, prosecuting attorney, Mr. William J. Schmid and Mr. Raymond C. Wetherell, for appellee.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Jack H. Bertsch, for the Board of Tax Appeals.


MATTHIAS, J.

Although the appellant assigns nine different errors, such errors raise only two actual questions. First, was functional depreciation properly considered in the valuation of appellant's property?, and, second, was the equalization program of the Board of Tax Appeals a valid exercise of its power under the applicable statutes?

The appellant contends that the original valuation placed upon its property by the county auditor was excessive, basing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases