1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 286 A.D.
  5. 286 A.D. 220 (1955)
 

CONNOLLY v. BELL

286 A.D. 220 (1955)

David J. Connolly et al., as Receivers to Collect a Judgment in Favor of Burlington County Bridge Commission, et al., Appellants, v. Robert K. Bell et al., Defendants, and Theodore R. Hanff et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 7, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Donald MacKinnon of counsel (Rebecca M. Cutler and Michael F. Orr with him on the brief; Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, attorneys), for appellants.

Frederick W. R. Pride of counsel (Donald J. Nugent and Robert M. Lane with him on the brief; Dwight, Royall, Harris, Koegel & Caskey, attorneys), for respondents.

COHN, J. P., BREITEL, BOTEIN and RABIN, JJ., concur.

CALLAHAN, J.

Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment in the Supreme Court, New York County, in an action on a judgment previously rendered in the State of New Jersey. The primary issue is whether the New Jersey judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in New York. (U. S. Const., art. IV, § 1; U. S. Code, tit. 28, § 1738.)

The New Jersey action was instituted in December, 1948, by the Governor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases