1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 203 Or.
  5. 203 Or. 285 (1955)
 

RAZ v. CITY OF PORTLAND

203 Or. 285 (1955)

280 P.2d 394

RAZ ET UX. v. CITY OF PORTLAND ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 16, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Lewis, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Arthur C. Bull and Henry Bauer, Portland.

Marian C. Rushing, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Alexander G. Brown, City Attorney and Folger Johnson, Jr., Deputy City Attorney, Portland.

AFFIRMED.

LATOURETTE, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs, the owners of approximately 100 acres, situate within a proposed sewer system, by their complaint challenge the validity of an ordinance of the City of Portland entitled, "An ordinance providing for the time and manner of constructing a system of sewers to be known as the S.W. Multnomah Boulevard Storm and Sanitary Trunk Sewer System." The trial court dismissed the complaint and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases