1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 132 F.Supp.
  5. 132 F.Supp. 305 (1955)
 

KENNEY v. FOX

Civ. A. No. 2542.

132 F.Supp. 305 (1955)

Edward James KENNEY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Raymond W. FOX, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Michigan, S. D.

June 3, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward James Kenney, Jr., Benton Harbor, Mich., in pro. per.

Gould Fox, Kalamazoo, Mich., for defendant.

STARR, Chief Judge.

On Plaintiff's Motion for a More Definite Statement

Rule 12(e) as amended of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., provides in part:

"If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, he may move for a more definite statement before interposing his responsive pleading. The motion shall point out the defects...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases