1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 133 F.Supp.
  5. 133 F.Supp. 238 (1955)
 

NONGARD v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION

Civ. A. No. 1144-52.

133 F.Supp. 238 (1955)

Richard C. NONGARD, Tuthill Ketcham and Rowland H. Murray, individually and as partners, trading as Ketcham & Nongard, Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION, a body politic, David J. Connelly and William H. Wells as Receivers, Defendants.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

June 29, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Hood, Newark, N. J., Thomas D. Begley, Burlington, N. J., Van Riper & Belmont, by Walter D. Van Riper, Newark, N. J., for the motion.

Vincent L. Gallaher, Camden, N. J., Thomas C. Egan, Philadelphia, Pa., contra.

FORMAN, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action are Richard C. Nongard, Tuthill Ketcham and Rowland H. Murray, all of Chicago, Illinois, individually, and as partners trading as Ketcham and Nongard. The defendants are the Burlington County Bridge Commission, a public body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey, and David J. Connolly and William H. Wells, of New Jersey, Receivers appointed by the Superior Court of New Jersey, to collect judgments entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases