1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Minn.
  4. 245 Minn.
  5. 245 Minn. 103 (1955)
 

STATE v. SULLIVAN

Nos. 36,582, 36,583.

245 Minn. 103 (1955)

STATE v. ALICE SULLIVAN, d.b.a. MERLE NORMAN COSMETIC STUDIO, AND ANOTHER.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 10, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry H. Peterson and Thomas H. McMeekin, for appellants.

Miles Lord, Attorney General, Charles A. Sawyer, City Attorney, and Joseph A. Hadley, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent.

MATSON, JUSTICE.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their separate motions in the alternative for judgment or a new trial.

Defendants, Alice Sullivan and Regina Benike (herein designated as Sullivan and Benike), were each convicted of violating M.S.A. 155.01 and 155.02 of the Minnesota beauty culture act. By stipulation, both cases were consolidated and tried together. Sullivan was found guilty of operating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases