1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 130 F.Supp.
  5. 130 F.Supp. 214 (1955)
 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SWIFT & COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 9793(1).

130 F.Supp. 214 (1955)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff, v. SWIFT & COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

March 25, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Carroll Stribling and Harold A. Thomas, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., Fordyce, Mayne, Hartman, Renard & Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

Norton J. Come and Duane Beeson, Assts. to Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Mozart G. Ratner, Chicago, Ill., Jacobs, Kamin & Ratner, Chicago, Ill., and Harry H. Craig, St. Louis, Mo., Wiley Craig & Armbruster, St. Louis, Mo., for Local Union No. 88, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, A.F.L.

MOORE, Chief Judge.

This is an action by National Labor Relations Board and a request for a preliminary injunction restraining respondent Swift & Company from in any manner seeking to enforce or avail itself of the benefits of a temporary restraining order which respondent obtained from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, against Local Union No. 88, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, A.F.L. and certain of its agents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases