Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
In our opinion, the sole purpose for the provision was to make respondent liable to furnish workmen's compensation to its employees, even when they were working in appellant's garage and in the event they might be deemed appellant's employees while so engaged. That it was not intended that respondent agree to protect appellant against liability for appellant's negligence is clear for two reasons: (1) the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.