1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 285 A.D.
  5. 285 A.D. 949 (1955)
 

HARTMAN, SHERIDAN & TEKULSKY v. HALE

285 A.D. 949 (1955)

Hartman, Sheridan & Tekulsky, Respondents, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant Bergdorf & Goodman Company, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth Hale, Respondent Bonwit Teller, Inc., Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth Hale, Respondent Federated Department Stores, Inc., Respondent, v. Elisabeth Hale, Respondent, and Bernard R. Hale, Appellant Lord & Taylor, a Division of Associated Dry Goods Corporation, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 29, 1955.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to consolidate the seven actions granted. There are issues common to all actions to be tried. There is also an especially valuable policy to be served by consolidation in this type of situation (see Benjamin v. Benjamin, 283 App. Div. 455). Settle order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases