1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 35 N.J.
  5. 35 N.J. Super. 86 (1955)
 

SOROKACH v. TRUSEWICH

35 N.J. Super. 86 (1955)

113 A.2d 194

ROSE SOROKACH, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER SOROKACH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM TRUSEWICH, ET AL., CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS ARROW CLOTHING COMPANY AND AS ARROW COAT & SUIT CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leopold Frankel argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Mr. Henry L. Janowski, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

The question before us is whether the Chancery Division correctly determined the "fair market value" of the operating machinery and equipment of a clothing manufacturing partnership, hereinafter designated as the "Arrow" company, as of October 1, 1950. The plaintiff's decedent, Alexander Sorokach, died that day one of six equal partners in the business and there ensued litigation over the settlement and evaluation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases