While appellant's proof was insufficient to establish his title to the property, nevertheless a hearing should have been directed pursuant to section 924 of the Civil Practice Act, since there was a sufficient showing of facts by the plaintiff to require a trial on the question of title. Appellant, if he so chooses, may assert his claim of title by intervening in the action instituted by the plaintiff and the Sheriff against the bank.
Order modified to the extent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.