Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
The bond was executed in this State, where the right to sue in courts in the subdivisions of the State is controlled by statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 182, et seq.) The parties to the bond obviously intended that the defendant was to pay up to a specified sum all unpaid claimants against the principal, who came within the definition of claimant in the bond. They stipulated that suit to establish the claims...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.