Plaintiff's claim in her first cause of action that the schedule of specific losses enumerated in Part I of the policy did not apply to her irrecoverable loss of sight of an eye is untenable. Plaintiff's cause of action is under Part I of the policy as set forth in the second cause of action. Plaintiff was entitled to the partial summary judgment she recovered. Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The question which remains for trial is when...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.