Judgments affirmed, with costs.
There is no proof that it was the gas of the respondent Esso Standard Oil Company which was sold to appellants on the occasion which resulted in the explosion.
Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment in each action insofar as it dismisses the complaints as against respondent Esso Standard Oil Company, and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum:
It is claimed that Esso negligently...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.