1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 84 S.E.2d
  5. 84 S.E.2d 904 (1954)
 

HOBBS v. GOODMAN

No. 531.

84 S.E.2d 904 (1954)

241 N.C. 297

Mrs. E. W. HOBBS v. Al GOODMAN and Ethel Goodman, t/d/b/a Al Goodman of Charlotte Fine Shoes, Original Defendants, and J. P. Hackney, Jr. and George D. Patterson, Trustees; and Pritchard Paint & Glass Company, Cross-Defendants.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McDougle, Ervin, Horack & Snepp and Robinson & Jones, Charlotte, for defendant appellants Goodman.

Pierce & Blakeney and R. E. Wardlow, Charlotte, for defendants Hackney and Patterson, appellees.

Cochran, McCleneghan & Miller, Charlotte, for defendant Pritchard Paint & Glass Co., appellee.

BARNHILL, Chief Justice.

While the language used in the amended complaint is somewhat more redundant and repetitious in nature than that used in the original complaint, this is due in part to the fact plaintiff, in her amended complaint, gives a more particular and detailed description of the object that fell and struck her as she passed by the defendants' store building and in her allegations of negligence. In the original complaint the object is described as an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases