1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 102 A.2d
  5. 102 A.2d 853 (1954)
 

MURRAY v. CARTMELL

No. 13.

102 A.2d 853 (1954)

MURRAY v. CARTMELL et al.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

February 2, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bloomer & Bloomer, Rutland, for plaintiff.

Wayne C. Bosworth and Frederick A. Bosworth, Middlebury, for defendants.

Before SHERBURNE, C. J., and JEFFORDS and ADAMS, JJ., and HULBURD, Superior Court Judge.

ADAMS, Justice.

This is a proceeding in chancery for a declaratory judgment under the provisions of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, V.S.1947, Chap. 77. The bill is met by a demurrer on the ground of lack of equity jurisdiction and that the Probate Court for the District of Addison and the Addison County Court are the only tribunals which have jurisdiction thereof. The demurrer was sustained, the bill dismissed and the plaintiff allowed exceptions. The cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases