1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 284 A.D.
  5. 284 A.D. 663 (1954)
 

BOWMAN v. GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO.

284 A.D. 663 (1954)

Betty Bowman, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

October 1, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Nicit for respondent.

Arthur VD. Chamberlain for appellant.

Present — VAUGHAN, J. P., KIMBALL, PIPER and WHEELER, JJ.

VAUGHAN, J. P.

Defendant appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Special Term, denying its motion under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings. The sole question is whether the amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The amended complaint alleges that the defendant, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, sold for immediate human consumption...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases