1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 126 F.Supp.
  5. 126 F.Supp. 817 (1954)
 

UNITED STATES v. HAAS

126 F.Supp. 817 (1954)

UNITED STATES of America v. Maurice HAAS, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Arthur GOLD, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

December 14, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty., New York City, for United States. Thomas W. Hill, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.

F. Joseph Donohue, Washington, D. C., Michael Kaminsky, New York City, for defendants Haas and Gold. Abraham S. Goldstein, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The defendant Haas moves to dismiss an indictment charging him with perjury on the ground that he was compelled to testify before the Grand Jury which returned it in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. The motion rests on the claim that Haas was served with a subpoena compelling his appearance and testimony before the Grand Jury and that he was not informed of his rights under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases