The receiver was justified, under the circumstances, in respecting the prohibition set forth in subdivision 1 of section 301 of the Multiple Dwelling Law and in accordingly refusing to rent the vacant apartments. In view of the serious nature of the violations, their pendency since 1947, defendants' knowledge of the violations and their failure to take action with relation thereto, the defendants Jones and Ward are not entitled to be recompensed for any rental losses.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.