1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 126 F.Supp.
  5. 126 F.Supp. 669 (1954)
 

KUERSCHNER & RAUCHWARENFABRIK v. SWISS BANK CORP.

126 F.Supp. 669 (1954)

KUERSCHNER & RAUCHWARENFABRIK, A.G., Julius Tsuk & Rudolf Tsuk, Plaintiffs, v. SWISS BANK CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

December 21, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Sargent, Doman & Grant, New York City, for plaintiffs, Nicholas R. Doman, New York City, of counsel.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant, Philip H. Weeks, New York City, of counsel.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

This is an action in which the individual plaintiffs, claiming to be the sole stockholders and officers of the corporate plaintiff, seek to recover a sum of money on deposit with the defendant's New York agency. The defendant moves to dismiss this third amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction or in the alternative for leave to serve the notice provided for by Section 51-a of the New York Civil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases