1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 123 F.Supp.
  5. 123 F.Supp. 608 (1954)
 

UNITED STATES v. CLARK

Crim. A. No. 23,067.

123 F.Supp. 608 (1954)

UNITED STATES v. CLARK.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

August 4, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., by Norman W. Neukom, and Richard A. Lavine, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., and George Willi, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., Tax Division, for plaintiff.

Charles H. Carr. William K. Rasmussen, Los Angeles, Cal., J. A. Donnelley, San Diego, Cal., for defendant.

YANKWICH, Chief Judge.

Whenever the Government and the defendant in a criminal case waive a jury, they are entitled to not just a verdict one way or the other, but to the reasons behind it. This conforms to the Canons of Judicial Ethics of the American Bar Association (Canon 19) and to a practice which I have followed consistently.1 So in what follows I shall set forth the problem involved in this case and the solution arrived at.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases