ARKWRIGHT v. STEINBUGLER


283 A.D. 397 (1954)

George A. Arkwright, Appellant, v. William F. C. Steinbugler, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 8, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Hyman and Harold W. Hayman for appellant.

Walter G. Evans and Joseph Kane for respondent.

NOLAN, P. J., MACCRATE, SCHMIDT, BELDOCK and MURPHY, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The motion for a change of venue was made on the ground that there was "good and valid reason to believe" that an impartial trial could not be held in Kings County and that the ends of justice would be promoted by the change of venue. Counsel for the defendant, while disclaiming any intention to infer that any justice of the Supreme Court would be other than impartial, has nevertheless asserted that in view...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases