BRANDT v. WINCHELL


283 A.D. 338 (1954)

Joseph L. Brandt, Respondent, v. Walter Winchell et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 16, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert H. Weil for respondent.

Clifton Cooper of counsel (Ernest Cuneo, E. Raymond Shepard and George Ainsworth, Jr., with him on the brief; Baldwin, Todd, Herold, Rose & Cooper attorneys), for Elmer H. Bobst, appellant.

Ernest Cuneo for Walter Winchell and John H. Teeter, appellants.

DORE and BOTEIN, JJ., concur with CALLAHAN, J.; PECK, P. J., dissents in opinion in which COHN, J., concurs.


CALLAHAN, J.

The complaint alleges two causes of action which are alike, except that the first is pleaded against the defendant Winchell alone and the second reiterates the same allegations in charging a conspiracy against all three defendants to injure the plaintiff.

The defendants have separately moved to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, or relief in the alternative.

The first cause of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases