THOMPSON v. DICKSON ET AL.


202 Or. 394 (1954)

275 P.2d 749

THOMPSON v. DICKSON ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 20, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph Moody and James B. Daniels, of Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With them on the brief were Moody & Lamkin, of Salem; B.G. Skulason, Leo Smith, Anderson, Franklin & Landye, Francis Yunker and Ryan & Pelay, of Portland.

Robert F. Maguire and Lamar Tooze, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent William L. Dickson. With them on the brief were John M. Pipes, Andrew Koerner, Ralph H. King, Hugh L. Biggs and Edwin J. Welsh, of Portland. Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General, of Salem, argued the cause for respondent Earl T. Newbry, Secretary of State of the State of Oregon. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, of Salem.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, ROSSMAN, LUSK and PERRY, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a decree of the Circuit Court which in effect determined that the defendant, William L. Dickson, is qualified to be a candidate for the office of judge of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County (Fourth Judicial District), Position No. 7, in the general election to be held November 2, 1954, and directed the defendant Secretary of State to certify the name of Mr. Dickson to the registrar of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases