1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 117 F.Supp.
  5. 117 F.Supp. 437 (1954)
 

MULTIPLATE GLASS CORP. v. POLAROID CORP.

Civ. No. 1555.

117 F.Supp. 437 (1954)

MULTIPLATE GLASS CORP. v. POLAROID CORP.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 15, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Ennalls Berl (of Berl, Potter & Anderson), Wilmington, Del., and Floyd H. Crews and Harvey M. Mortimer (of Darby & Darby, New York City, for plaintiff.

Arthur G. Connolly and Thomas Cooch (of Connolly, Cooch & Bove), Wilmington, Del., and Donald L. Brown, Cambridge, Mass., and Rowland V. Patrick (of Fish, Richardson & Neave), Boston, Mass., for defendant.

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Multiplate Glass Corporation on July 24, 1953, sought relief by filing a declaratory judgment action against Polaroid Corporation, basing it on a controversy concerning four Polaroid patents. Later, on August 7, 1953, Polaroid filed suit in the District of Massachusetts against Loew's, Inc., a Multiplate customer, alleging infringement of three of the four patents. Then, on September 11, 1953, upon Multiplate's motion, this court granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases