1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 124 F.Supp.
  5. 124 F.Supp. 356 (1954)
 

BERESLAVSKY v. UNITED STATES

No. 48722.

124 F.Supp. 356 (1954)

Euphime V. BERESLAVSKY v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims

October 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Brown Morton, New York City, for plaintiff. Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, New York City, were on the briefs.

T. Hayward Brown, Washington, D. C., with whom was Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and LARAMORE, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

This case is before us on the sole question of the validity of claim 1 of plaintiff's patent, which plaintiff alleges the defendant infringed. The question of infringement, however, is not before us at this time. Claim 1 reads:

"A low compression motor fuel, such as gasoline or kerosene, containing a compound belonging to the mesitylene group."

As explained in the specifications:

"This invention relates to the suppression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases