1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 124 F.Supp.
  5. 124 F.Supp. 329 (1954)
 

PANAVIEW DOOR AND WINDOW CO. v. VAN NESS

No. 16767.

124 F.Supp. 329 (1954)

PANAVIEW DOOR AND WINDOW CO., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. Fred VAN NESS, Beatrice H. Van Ness, Sun Valley Sliding Door Company, Van Ness Louvre Company, a corporation, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

September 24, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Mahoney, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

David Mellinkoff, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendants.

HALL, District Judge.

The complaint after amendments, as it now stands on the Motion to Dismiss, is a complaint for damages for unfair competition. There is no diversity of citizenship alleged. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. There is neither trade-mark nor trade-name, either registered or unregistered, asserted; and neither a copyright nor a patent is involved. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1051-1127.

The sole jurisdictional peg upon which plaintiff hangs its hat is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases