1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 285 A.D.
  5. 285 A.D. 148 (1954)
 

McCLOSKEY v. CHASE NAT. BANK

285 A.D. 148 (1954)

John J. McCloskey, as Sheriff of The City of New York, et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Chase National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 21, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rene Loeb of counsel (Daniel Scheyer and Leonard Wacksman with him on the brief; Rene Loeb, attorney), for appellants-respondents.

A. Donald MacKinnon of counsel (Janet P. Kane with him on the brief; Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, attorneys), for respondent-appellant.

PECK, P. J., COHN, BREITEL and BOTEIN, JJ., concur.

CALLAHAN, J.

This action is one in aid of attachment under article 55 of the New York Civil Practice Act. Both sides moved for summary judgment. There is no dispute as to the essential facts, but Special Term felt that the questions relating to the legal effect of the documents involved and of a certain judgment of a Pennsylvania court should await trial.

We find no triable issue. There are three translations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases