1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 201 Or.
  5. 201 Or. 202 (1954)
 

ROLFE ET UX. v. POWERS ET UX.

201 Or. 202 (1954)

269 P.2d 490

ROLFE ET UX. v. POWERS ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 14, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis E. Harrington, of Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

James L. Conley argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Conley and Greene, of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, ROSSMAN and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs for rescission of a contract made with the defendants for the purchase of the latters' hardware business in Taft, Oregon. Plaintiffs rest their claim of right upon allegations of misrepresentation as to the annual net earnings of that business. From a decree dismissing their complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

Here their whole case is predicated upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases