1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 119 F.Supp.
  5. 119 F.Supp. 284 (1954)
 

INDUSTRIAL LITHOGRAPHIC CO. v. MENDELSOHN

Civ. A. No. 965-52.

119 F.Supp. 284 (1954)

INDUSTRIAL LITHOGRAPHIC CO., Inc. v. MENDELSOHN et al. (McKESSON & ROBBINS, Inc., Third-Party Defendant).

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

February 24, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hein, Smith & Mooney, by Seymour A. Smith, Hackensack, N. J., for plaintiff.

Paul Rittenberg, Paterson, N. J., for third party plaintiffs. Max Mehler, Newark, N. J., of counsel.

Pitney, Hardin & Ward, by William P. Reiss, Newark, N. J., for third party defendant.

MEANEY, District Judge.

The question before the court on this motion is whether a claim introduced into an action by a third party should afford the basis for removal.

Industrial Lithographic Co. Inc., a New York corporation, originally began this action by bringing suit in the courts of the State of New Jersey against defendants, Louis H. Mendelsohn and Abram C. Mendelsohn, individually and trading as Excello Hosiery Mills, citizens of New Jersey. Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases