1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 122 F.Supp.
  5. 122 F.Supp. 265 (1954)
 

RUTKIN v. REINFELD

122 F.Supp. 265 (1954)

RUTKIN v. REINFELD et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 22, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Edelbaum, New York City, for plaintiff.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, for defendants Joseph H. Reinfeld, Renfield Importers, Ltd., and Harold C. Renfield (Theodore Kiendl, William R. Meagher, New York City, of counsel).

White & Case, New York City, for defendants Samuel Bronfman, Allen Bronfman and Browne-Vintners Co., Inc. (Lowell Wadmond, New York City, Thomas Kiernan, New York City, of counsel).

MURPHY, District Judge.

These are motions by defendants under Rules 50(a) and 50(b), Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., (1) to dismiss the complaint and supplemental complaint and for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's case, (2) for a directed verdict at the close of all of the evidence, and (3) after verdict by the jury for plaintiff, to set aside that verdict and enter judgment on one directed for defendants. Judgment having been reserved on the first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases