DEL RUBIO v. DUCHESNE


284 A.D. 89 (1954)

Manuel Del Rubio, Respondent, v. Francisco Duchesne et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 11, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Nathan of counsel (Irving E. Fromer, attorney), for appellants.

Henry L. Redner of counsel (Ader & Smith, attorneys), for respondent.

PECK, P. J., COHN, BREITEL and BOTEIN, JJ., concur.


BERGAN, J.

The complaint is in the usual form for the foreclosure of a purchase-money mortgage which plaintiff holds as assignee. The defendants Calvente, who were the mortgagors, and the defendant Duchesne, their grantee now in possession, assert that the mortgage is usurious and unenforcible. The court at Special Term was of opinion that usury is no answer to the foreclosure of a purchase-money mortgage and plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases